🔗 Share this article

Among the most iconic images from modern history shows an unclothed young girl, her hands extended, her expression distorted in pain, her flesh scorched and flaking. She appears dashing towards the camera as running from an airstrike within the conflict. Nearby, other children also run away from the destroyed village of the region, against a background of black clouds and military personnel.

This International Effect from an Powerful Photograph

Shortly after its publication in June 1972, this picture—officially called "The Terror of War"—became an analog phenomenon. Seen and discussed by countless people, it has been generally credited for motivating worldwide views opposing the US war in Southeast Asia. A prominent author later remarked that the horrifically unforgettable photograph of the young Kim Phúc in distress possibly had a greater impact to increase public revulsion against the war compared to lengthy broadcasts of broadcast barbarities. An esteemed English photojournalist who covered the fighting labeled it the ultimate image from the so-called “The Television War”. A different veteran photojournalist declared how the picture stands as simply put, among the most significant images ever made, specifically of the Vietnam war.

The Decades-Long Credit and a Modern Assertion

For over five decades, the photograph was assigned to the work of a South Vietnamese photographer, a young South Vietnamese photographer employed by the Associated Press in Saigon. Yet a controversial latest investigation on a popular platform contends that the iconic picture—long considered to be the peak of photojournalism—may have been taken by another person present that day in Trảng Bàng.

As presented in the investigation, the iconic image may have been captured by a stringer, who sold his work to the news agency. The assertion, along with the documentary's resulting research, began with a former editor an ex-staffer, who states how the dominant photo chief directed the staff to alter the photograph's attribution from the stringer to the staff photographer, the one AP staff photographer there at the time.

This Search for the Real Story

The former editor, currently elderly, emailed an investigator in 2022, seeking assistance to identify the uncredited cameraman. He expressed how, should he still be alive, he wished to extend an apology. The investigator reflected on the freelance photojournalists he knew—comparing them to current independents, just as independent journalists in that era, are routinely marginalized. Their efforts is often doubted, and they operate under much more difficult circumstances. They lack insurance, they don’t have pensions, they don’t have support, they usually are without adequate tools, making them highly exposed while photographing within their homeland.

The filmmaker wondered: “What must it feel like to be the individual who made this photograph, if indeed it wasn't Nick Út?” As a photographer, he speculated, it could be deeply distressing. As an observer of photojournalism, especially the celebrated combat images from that war, it might be earth-shattering, perhaps career-damaging. The hallowed heritage of the photograph within Vietnamese-Americans is such that the filmmaker who had family fled at the time felt unsure to engage with the film. He said, I hesitated to challenge this long-held narrative attributed to Nick the image. Nor did I wish to disrupt the status quo of a community that had long admired this achievement.”

The Inquiry Unfolds

Yet the two the journalist and the creator felt: it was worth posing the inquiry. As members of the press are to keep the world responsible,” remarked the investigator, “we have to be able to pose challenging queries within our profession.”

The documentary follows the team as they pursue their own investigation, from discussions with witnesses, to public appeals in present-day Saigon, to reviewing records from related materials taken that day. Their work eventually yield a candidate: a freelancer, a driver for a news network during the attack who sometimes provided images to international news outlets as a freelancer. According to the documentary, a moved the man, currently elderly residing in the US, claims that he handed over the famous picture to the news organization for $20 with a physical photo, only to be troubled without recognition for decades.

The Response and Additional Scrutiny

The man comes across throughout the documentary, thoughtful and calm, however, his claim became controversial within the community of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to